Lire cet article en français

TIRCIA · General public

Breakups: why some are so hard to get over

What psychology and research tell us, and what can help

A person seen from behind walking alone on a beach in the early morning, leaving footprints in the sand

After a separation, most people gradually feel better over the weeks and months. For others, the pain settles in: intrusive thoughts, an overwhelming urge to get back in touch, guilt, a sense of being unable to move on. This is an understandable reaction, and it has its reasons. Here is what research helps us to understand, what is still a clinical hypothesis, and what can help.

In brief

  • A separation is one of the most stressful life events.
  • For most people, sadness and attachment lessen over time; staying in contact with the former partner slows this down.
  • The "craving" felt after a breakup involves the brain's reward and wanting circuits, which explains its strength.
  • When the relationship involved coercive control or violence, mechanisms such as idealisation or guilt can block grieving.
  • Specific therapeutic approaches have been proposed, notably in EMDR, but their effectiveness has not yet been evaluated in trials.

1. An ordeal recognised as major

As early as 1967, the psychiatrists Thomas Holmes and Richard Rahe ranked life events according to the effort of adjustment they demand. On their scale, the death of a spouse comes first with 100 points, followed by divorce (73 points) and marital separation (65 points) (Holmes and Rahe, 1967). The scale is old and was designed for married couples, but it is a reminder of something everyone knows: a separation upends daily life, identity, plans and often one's social network all at once.

One study followed 58 young adults after a breakup, using an emotion diary completed several times a day for four weeks (Sbarra and Emery, 2005). Love for the former partner gradually decreased. Sadness, anger and relief changed less steadily, with large day-to-day fluctuations, especially at the beginning. Two findings are particularly useful: each person's attachment style influenced the intensity and speed of recovery, and staying in contact with the former partner slowed the decline in love and sadness.

A breakup means losing more than a person: it also shakes one's sense of self. In a series of three studies, recently separated people described a less clear identity, as if "shrunken", and this blurring contributed to their distress over and above the grief of losing the other person (Slotter, Gardner and Finkel, 2010). Conversely, in a study of 210 separated young adults, those who regularly took time to reflect on their breakup, as part of the research, regained a clearer sense of self, and it was this renewed clarity that explained the fall in intrusive thoughts and loneliness (Larson and Sbarra, 2015). Asking oneself "who am I now, without this relationship?" is very much part of the work of grieving.

2. "Craving": a reality in the brain

After a breakup, many people describe an overwhelming urge to call, to write, to check the other person's social media, even when they know the relationship was hurting them. A brain imaging study observed 15 people who had recently been left but were still deeply attached, while they looked at a photo of their former partner (Fisher et al., 2010). The regions activated were those involved in motivation and reward, those of the intense wanting seen in addiction, and those of pain and distress. The researchers see this as a specific form of addiction.

This finding should be kept in proportion: the study is small, and speaking of "addiction" is an analogy rather than a diagnosis. But it helps to explain why a simple rational decision ("I won't call any more") is so hard to stick to. In the same study, the more time had passed since the breakup, the less active an area linked to attachment became. Little by little, the brain learns to let go.

Social media keeps this craving alive. In a study of 464 people, those who often looked at their former partner's profile reported more breakup-related distress, more longing and nostalgia for the other person, and less personal growth, independently of face-to-face contact (Marshall, 2012). The study is correlational: it does not prove that monitoring causes distress, and the two probably feed each other. But each glance works like a small "dose" that rekindles the craving.

3. When a breakup reopens older wounds

The same separation can be weathered without too much damage by one person and become an endless ordeal for another. One clinical explanation is that a breakup can reactivate older experiences: abandonment in childhood, emotional insecurity, a painful previous relationship. The model on which EMDR therapy is based proposes that certain memories, insufficiently "processed" at the time they were lived, remain active and colour present experiences (Shapiro, 2018).

This is a clinical model, useful for understanding and for therapeutic work, rather than a mechanism demonstrated at the level of the brain. Above all, it helps to ease self-blame: if a breakup hurts this much, it is often because it touches something beyond the relationship that has just ended.

4. Idealisation: protecting the image of the other

After a relationship marked by coercive control or violence, some people can only remember the good times. They defend their former partner, minimise what they went through, and sometimes go back to them. The psychologists Dolores Mosquera and Jim Knipe have described this phenomenon as an idealisation defence. In their view, it is often learned in childhood, with attachment figures who failed to provide care, when acknowledging reality would be unbearable and escape is impossible (Mosquera and Knipe, 2017).

In adulthood, this defence goes on protecting the image of the partner, at the expense of the person's own safety. The authors propose, in EMDR therapy, working on the positive memories that sustain idealisation, in order to arrive at a more accurate view of the relationship. Their article is based on three clinical cases: it is an interesting avenue for clinical work that has yet to be evaluated as a method.

One experiment sheds light on this work on idealisation. People who had recently been left looked at photos of their former partner while applying different strategies. Recalling the partner's flaws reduced feelings of love, but also made them sadder in the moment (Langeslag and Sanchez, 2018). The study is small (24 participants) and measures only immediate effects. Yet it echoes a clinical reality: looking at the relationship clearly helps us to let go, though it often hurts at first. This pain is part of the journey.

5. Guilt: a paradoxical way of keeping control

It is normal to feel regret after a separation. But some people remain trapped in disproportionate guilt: "if I had been different, he wouldn't have left", "it's my fault he became violent". Specialist clinicians describe this guilt as a paradoxical way of holding on to a sense of control: it is less frightening to believe oneself responsible than to acknowledge one's powerlessness in the face of the other person's behaviour (Rodríguez-Garay and Mosquera, 2022).

In coercive relationships, this mechanism is often fuelled by the partner, who reverses responsibility and makes the person doubt their own perceptions. Recognising this process is often an important step towards letting go of guilt.

6. Starting with the present

In 2022, two clinicians proposed an adaptation of EMDR specifically for difficult breakups, the Break-Up Aid Procedure (BUAP), in three stages (Rodríguez-Garay and Mosquera, 2022). Their central idea: when current distress is very high, with insomnia, obsessive thoughts and a constant urge to get back in touch, it is better to start by soothing the present and the most recent events, before exploring the older experiences that made the person vulnerable.

This logic matches what many therapists do in practice. But it needs to be said clearly: the BUAP is a clinical proposal, published without effectiveness data. No trial has yet evaluated whether it does better than other approaches.

For therapists who wish to explore this approach further, TIRCIA offers a dedicated programme: Quand le lien se rompt: treating traumatic breakups (in French).

What is well establishedWhat remains a clinical hypothesis
A separation is a highly stressful life eventThat difficult breakups are explained by "unprocessed" memories
For most people, emotions settle over timeThat idealisation of the former partner is learned in childhood
Staying in contact slows recoveryThat guilt serves to maintain a sense of control
Craving involves the reward and wanting circuitsThat a specific EMDR procedure is more effective than another approach

7. What can help

  • Limit contact with your former partner, including on social media, at least for a while: this is one of the best-documented factors in easing recovery.
  • Name what is happening: craving, intrusive thoughts and relapses of sadness are normal reactions, and part of the process of recovery.
  • Keep your bearings: sleep, physical activity, ties with family and friends. A breakup is often isolating; relationships are a source of support.
  • Look at the relationship clearly, including its difficult aspects, when you catch yourself remembering only the good times.
  • Ask for help when the suffering does not lessen after several months, when it prevents you from working or sleeping, or when the relationship involved coercive control or violence.

If you are having suicidal thoughts, it is important to talk about them without delay. Contact a crisis line: 988 (US/Canada), Samaritans 116 123 (UK and Ireland), or find a local helpline at findahelpline.com. In France: 3114. If you are in immediate danger, call your local emergency number (999 in the UK, 911 in North America, 112 in the EU). If you are experiencing domestic abuse, contact your local domestic abuse helpline (in the UK, the National Domestic Abuse Helpline, 0808 2000 247, free and available 24/7); in France, 3919 (Violences Femmes Info) is free and anonymous.

Clinical vignette

A fictional case, composed from common clinical situations.

Inès, 33, seeks help four months after being left by text message, after six years of living together. She sleeps badly, checks her ex-partner's profile every evening and keeps telling herself: "if I had been less demanding, he would have stayed". She is ashamed of feeling so bad "over a mere breakup".

The first sessions focus on the present: understanding the craving, deciding to hide her ex's profile, getting back into a sleep routine. The EMDR work first targets the most recent and most vivid moment, reading the breakup message: disturbance at 8 out of 10, belief "I don't matter". Over the sessions, the intensity decreases. An older memory then emerges: at the age of 7, her father leaving without explanation. This memory becomes the next target.

Three months later, Inès still thinks about her ex, but without rushing to her phone. The belief "I don't matter" has given way to "I have the right to matter to someone". Her guilt has turned into more nuanced regrets: she sees what she could have done differently, and what was beyond her control.

What is established, and what is not

  • Established: for most people, distress gradually lessens after a breakup, with ups and downs. Staying in contact with the former partner slows this recovery.
  • Well supported: a breakup shakes one's sense of self, and rebuilding it goes hand in hand with recovery. Monitoring an ex on social media is associated with more distress.
  • An analogy rather than a diagnosis: craving involves brain circuits similar to those of addiction, according to a small imaging study.
  • Clinical hypotheses: the reactivation of old wounds, idealisation and guilt as defences. These are useful models in therapy rather than demonstrated mechanisms.
  • Not evaluated: the effectiveness of EMDR protocols specific to breakups. That said, a breakup that has left genuine post-traumatic stress calls for validated trauma treatments, including EMDR.

Frequently asked questions

How long does it take to get over a breakup?

There is no normal length of time. In studies, recovery is gradual, with ups and downs. The warning sign lies less in the duration itself than in suffering that does not lessen at all, or that stops you from living.

Should you stay friends with your ex?

It is entirely possible, but the data suggest that contact, at least in the first few weeks, keeps attachment and sadness alive. Taking some distance at the start often makes a calmer relationship easier later on, if you want one.

Can you really be "addicted" to someone?

Not in the diagnostic sense. But the craving after a breakup involves brain circuits similar to those of addiction, which explains how intense the urge to get back in touch can be.

Is EMDR effective for breakups?

EMDR has proven its worth in post-traumatic stress. For breakups, there are clinical proposals, such as the BUAP, but no published trials yet. A breakup experienced as traumatic, or marked by violence, may nevertheless warrant trauma-focused therapy.

Should you block your ex on social media?

It is a choice rather than an obligation, but it is often helpful at first. Regularly checking the other person's profile is associated with more distress and more nostalgia. Hiding or muting their profile, without necessarily blocking it, may be enough to break this cycle.

In one sentence

A breakup that hurts a great deal says nothing about weakness: it involves attachment, craving, and sometimes older wounds.

Time, distance and, if needed, appropriate support most often make it possible to move on.

References

  1. Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51-60. Link
  2. Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2), 213-218.
  3. Langeslag, S. J. E., & Sanchez, M. E. (2018). Down-regulation of love feelings after a romantic break-up: Self-report and electrophysiological data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 720-733. Link
  4. Larson, G. M., & Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Participating in research on romantic breakups promotes emotional recovery via changes in self-concept clarity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 399-406. Link
  5. Marshall, T. C. (2012). Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 521-526. Link
  6. Mosquera, D., & Knipe, J. (2017). Idealization and maladaptive positive emotion: EMDR therapy for women who are ambivalent about leaving an abusive partner. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 11(1), 54-66. French version (2019), 13(2), E1-E15. Link
  7. Rodríguez-Garay, A., & Mosquera, D. (2022). Using EMDR to treat intimate partner relationship break-up issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 971856. Link
  8. Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213-232. Link
  9. Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  10. Slotter, E. B., Gardner, W. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 147-160. Link

This article offers general guidance, up to date at the date of publication. It is no substitute for the advice of a doctor, who alone can make a diagnosis, or for support from a psychologist or psychotherapist.

Créé avec